Newsgroups: comp.lang.apl
Path: watmath!watserv1!torn!utcsri!rpi!usc!wupost!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!haven.umd.edu!socrates!socrates!rockwell
From: rockwell@socrates.umd.edu (Raul Deluth Miller-Rockwell)
Subject: Re: SIGNUM of teaching numerical methods
In-Reply-To: andrew@rentec.com's message of 24 Jul 92 23:06:59 GMT
Message-ID: <ROCKWELL.92Jul26190755@socrates.umd.edu>
Sender: rockwell@socrates.umd.edu (Raul Deluth Miller-Rockwell)
Organization: Traveller
References: <ROCKWELL.92Jul18201144@socrates.umd.edu> <1088@kepler1.rentec.com>
	<1992Jul23.045513.20017@yrloc.ipsa.reuter.COM>
	<1117@kepler1.rentec.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 00:07:55 GMT
Lines: 12

Robert Bernecky:
   >a. WHEN APL code can compete in loopy-type stuff, with Fortran,
   >   many arguments against APL will vanish.

Andrew Mullhaupt:
   Yes. And what I _really_ want to know is why is this not a problem
   which has been solved ten years ago?

It was.  The compiler we use at work is about that old.

-- 
Raul Deluth Miller-Rockwell                   <rockwell@socrates.umd.edu>
